您现在的位置: 全球IP通信联盟 >> 统一通信 >> 技术 >> 正文

思科统一通信的架构战略

[2009-3-5 11:46:58] 关键字:统一通信0 思科0 

欢迎订阅周刊:    周刊回顾     【繁體中文】【字体:


摘要:思科统一通信的架构战略。……
  • Overview

    With the myriad of approaches
    available, selecting a unified
    communications architecture
    can prove overwhelming.
    Enterprise organizations must
    operate within the parameters
    of limited IT budgets and unique
    methodologies and goals. The best unified communications options are
    open and extensible, enabling new, media-rich and Web-rich applications,
    flexible implementation options, and integration into existing business
    applications and processes.
    Cisco® Unified Communications solutions with built-in network awareness
    and optimization are considered "network-centric." Network-centric platforms
    resolve issues that other types of unified communications solutions often
    overlook including performance, scalability, reliability, security, and extensibility.
    Intelligently architected, such solutions can be delivered in multiple ways: as
    software only on third-party, off-the-shelf servers; as software only on Cisco
    servers; as a combined software and hardware package; or in appliance
    form with multiple applications combined onto a single platform.
    This paper explains how your organization can easily adopt a unified
    communications solution to the extent desired, and then expand the
    system incrementally over time. You will learn how the open
    environment of the Cisco Unified Communications platform:
    • Integrates with existing enterprise resources

    • Supports third-party devices, applications, and platforms

    • Easily scales to synchronize with organizational growth

    With versatile tools for both internal and industry developers, the platform also
    facilitates the creation of Web 2.0 and rich media applications, allowing
    partners, customers, and developers to easily and quickly create custom
    applications using open APIs such as SIP/SIMPLE, XML, HTTP, and SOAP.
    The Unified Communications Landscape

    Identifying Key Advantages and Limitations

    The most visible vendors in the unified communications environment today are
    those that have already established a firm foothold in their respective markets
    due to the recognized quality of their products, services and support. Most of
    these vendors seek to give customers a cost-effective unified communications
    option by leveraging their installed hardware and software systems and
    building on successful technologies to produce new platforms, products, and
    services. A few newer companies are also attempting to make inroads in
    unified communications markets. Current offerings tend to fall into a few
    distinct categories. By clearly understanding the advantages and limitations
    of each of these approaches, organizations can make better decisions
    regarding both short-term and long-term unified communications strategies.
    Software-Only Options

    Software-only solutions for integrated business communications tend to provide
    affordable, easily implemented options with substantial short-term cost benefits
    and valuable business improvements. However, for the most part they lack
    long-term guarantees, fail to address the limitations of dated infrastructure
    components, and take minimal advantage of the communications network. At
    best these solutions ignore the network, and at worst leave organizations
    vulnerable to serious network-related problems. Issues can range from
    excessive network maintenance requirements to scalability limits and
    performance degradation. Today's software-only business communications
    solutions include:
    Peer-to-Peer (P2P)
    The P2P approach minimizes capital outlay and offers a fast path to enhanced
    unified communications capabilities. This approach generally relies on a
    proprietary software client to perform basic unified communications functions
    such as voice calling and voice conferencing. An attractive advantage to P2P
    is that no additional hardware investment is required onsite. The drawback
    is that the P2P approach presents extreme administrative difficulties. The IT
    team can never hope to exert full control over network usage, security,
    performance, and the availability of people and applications across the
    network environment. In addition, the "black box" approach to establishing
    connectivity constantly puts obstacles in the path of administrators when
    new applications must be integrated into the system or when existing
    applications require updates and upgrades.

    [1] [2] 下一页

我对该产品/资料感兴趣 请安排负责人员与我联系
姓 名:
*
电子邮箱:
*
联系电话:
*
手 机:
用户类型:
行业用户 企业用户 代理集成商 其他 *
公司名称:
城 市:
留言内容:
验证码:
*
责任编辑:北极星 文章来源:全球IP通信联盟

 
  • 上一篇文章:

  •  
  • 下一篇文章:


  • VoIP|VoIP论坛|什么是VoIP|voip网络电话|voip电话|voip技术|voip网关|voip设备|免费voip| 网友评论: (只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)
    VoIP|VoIP论坛|什么是VoIP|voip网络电话|voip电话|voip技术|voip网关|voip设备|免费voip| 发表评论:
     评 分:
    1分 2分 3分 4分 5分
     评论内容:
  • ·严禁发表危害国家安全、政治、黄色淫秽等内容的评论。
  • ·用户需对自己在使用全球IP通信联盟网服务过程中的行为承担法律责任。
  • ·本站管理员有权保留或删除评论内容。
  • ·评论内容只代表网友个人观点,与本网站立场无关。
  • 在提交信息前请输入验证码:
    【字体: 】【发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
    文章搜索
    ◆ 此文章读者还阅读以下文章
    ◆ 每周点击新闻排行
    ◆ 图片新闻
    ◆ 论坛精华帖
    ◆ 精华博文
    Google Advertisement
    全球IP通信联盟,解放您的沟通,关注VoIP发展 www.microvoip.com

    Copyright©2003-2009 全球IP通信联盟 版权所有
    联系电话:010-82212911/12/13
    021-51701588/85/89/86
    沪ICP备05005909号